What is an h-index?
A h-index is a rough summary measure of a researcher’s productivity and impact. Productivity is quantified by the number of papers, and impact by the number of citations the researchers' publications have received. It can be useful for identifying the centrality of certain researchers as researchers with a higher h-index will, in general, have produced more work which is considered important by their peers.
How is an h-index calculated?
The h-index was originally defined as the number of papers with citation number ≥ h. That's a fairly simple definition, but it becomes even clearer when illustrated in an example. So, in order to calculate a h-index follow these steps:
- Rank all the papers by that author by the number of times they have been cited.
- The h-index is just above the entry at which the rank in the list is greater than the number of citations.
|3||Article C||4||← h-index is 3|
|4||Article D||3||← The citation number here is less than the article rank|
The definition of the h-index comes with quite few desirable features:
- First, it is relatively unaffected by outliers. If Article A had been cited 1,000 times, this would not change the h-index.
- Second, the h-index will generally only increase if the researcher continues to produce good work. The h-index would increase to 4 if another paper was added with 4 citations, but would not increase if papers were added with fewer citations.
- Third, the h-index will never be greater than the number of papers the author has published; to have an h-index of 20, the author must have published at least 20 articles which have each been cited at least 20 times.
Visually, the h-index can also be determined by charting the data. The h-index is then determined by the interception of the chart's diagonal with the citation data. In this case there are 3 papers that are above the diagonal, and hence the h-index is 3.
Why it is important for your career to know about the h-index
The h-index is not something that needs to be calculated on a daily basis, but it's good to know where you are for several reasons. First, climbing the h-index ladder is something worth celebrating. If it's worth opening a bottle of champagne or just getting a cafe latte that's up to you, but seriously take your time to celebrate this achievement (there aren't that many in academia). But more importantly, the h-index is one of the measures funding agencies or the university's hiring committee calculate when you apply for a grant or a position. Given the often huge number of applications, the h-index is calculated in order to rank candidates and apply a pre-filter.
Of course, funding agencies and hiring committees do use tools for calculating the h-index, and so can you. Check out our guides on how to calculate your h-index with Scopus, Web of Science or Google Scholar.
It is important to note that depending on the underlying data that these services have collected, your h-index might be different. Let's have a look at the h-index of the well known physicist Stephen W. Hawking to illustrate it:
So, if you are aware of a number of citations of your work that are not listed in these databases, e.g. because they are in conference proceedings not indexed in these databases, then please state that in your application. It might give your h-index an extra boost.
Can all your academic achievements be summarized by a single number?
Definitely not! People are aware of this and there have been many attempts to address particular shortcomings of the h-index, but in the end it's just another number that is meant to emphasise or de-emphasise certain aspects of the h-index. Anyway, you have to know the rules in order to play the game, and you have to know the rules in order to change them. If you feel that your h-index does not properly reflect your academic achievements, then be pro-active and mention that in your application!